Well, Valencia got a deal with Atletico de Madrid to sign Arizmendi this week. He's a tall forward playing for Deportivo this season. Arizmendi can play also as right winger but actually I see him like a "new" Angulo. He's not specially striker because he scored 10 goals in 70 games... Furthermore, Valencia is going to pay for him about 6.5 € millions!! I think it's too much for a player who doesn't have enough level to play in Valencia...

Sometimes Arizmendi shows good skills, but he doesn't know scoring goals to be a great forward. And here is one exemple where he missed a incredible goal against Madrid:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFh4IURBAXs[/youtube]

What a worthles signing.Every che fan disagrees with this.I can't believ we bought him,instead we could have used the money to get Sneijder.I also don't liek the fact that we are not looking at SA.There are so many highly rated strikers there.

he's normal, but i would still prefer trezeguet

I don't think that he is bad...He is young and can improve himself. But 6,5 million is to much for a player like him. With that money we could buy better players. But I hope that he will demonstrate that he is good and that he will have success in Valencia. I don't like prejudices...

A forward——scored 10 goals in nearly 80 games...
Right winger? We have Sisi and Pablo!

i am an admirer of Arizmendi,he is young and has great skills.But we will see soon

great skills!

If missing an open goal is a skill,I can do that too!

In football everything is important,not only how much goals u scored,thaths why i think that Arizmendi is talanted player.and of course he is away from Villa and Morientes ,but do u think that Angulo is better than Arizmendi?

In my opnion, Angulo is equal to Arizmendi. But Angulo cost our club 0€, the 'Narizmendi'...

yes missing an open goal is very funny we can enjoy thru the whole season, so that's the reason why we signed him.

I can imagine when Arizmendi and Angulo they both play and both shooting away, how amazing it should be! Just like last match we got 3 own goals.

I agree with you. I think he is not as bad as people say, this opinion could may be for the dissapointment due to signing him for 6'5 million €. He is a good player to be in the bench and to be used to have a rest for Villa, Moro or Silva, but not for 6'5 M.

He is not too young. He's 23 and his skills probably won't be improved so much. I wish to be mistaken and I wish he proves my mistake.

But God never can be wrong.

In my opinion Angulo is much better than Arismendi

I think Arizmendi is a good young prospect and will improve if he is at a better team like Valencia.

Arizmendi SUCKS!

Significant detail:
we get a player who scores 10 times in 70 appearances and suddenly he is a good young prospect.

another team gets the same type of dude and it's a big mistake...

I know it, Arizmendi is the big mistake!!!!!!!

He's really bad. A forward without goal.... 7 millions it's a robbery!

His information ...



10 goals !!!


Another day someone here, had the value to say that Podolski only had made 4 (in 22 matches). Podolski is 22 years old and has done 51 goals with his teams, and enough goals with the German selection

In short, he's fucking ugly.

xD I was talking about football, but... yes! in addition he is ugly and a fucking fascist !!!
And answering to the previous question ... yes, Angulo is better enough than Arizmendi as player (I don't speak about his look)

I think it is too early to say how Arizmendi will play.I think we have to be behind our players and to wish them all good,and Arizmendi is a player of Valencia ,too!